Showing posts with label climate change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label climate change. Show all posts

Tuesday, 13 October 2015

EU climate chief hails global progress on emissions

EU climate chief hails global progress on emissions

  • 13 October 2015
  •  
  • From the sectionScience & Environment
Miguel Arias CaneteImage copyrightAP
Image captionCommissioner Canete says the published plans are "astounding"
Europe's climate change chief says he is astonished at the positive progress by governments towards a global deal on CO2.
Miguel Arias Cañete said it was "quite astounding" that 149 nations have published their plans to curb carbon emissions.
He told BBC News that even six months ago he would not have believed such commitments would emerge.
Nations have been announcing plans ahead of the Paris climate summit.
He warned, though, that nations' pledges had not yet reached the level needed to prevent potentially dangerous warming.
Mr Cañete said: "There are many, many reasons to be cheerful. The fact that 149 countries to date have presented the United Nations their commitments to fight global warming is astonishing.
"We have countries which together produce nearly 90% of global emissions - so that's a big effort. If we compare it with the Kyoto Protocol - the first time we tried an international agreement to help global warming - there were only 35 countries and they covered less than 14% of emissions.
"It's quite astounding. The most important things is that the commitments are not only figures or targets - it shows countries are developing climate policies in a very comprehensive way."

Top-down target

Mr Cañete said the key was that instead of a UN conference imposing top-down targets, governments were volunteering their own action plans.
"There is no complacency - but we if we had kept on going with business as usual (ever-rising carbon emissions), global temperature would have raised between 3.8 and 4.7C," he said.
"We estimate that current commitments achieve about 3C maximum. That's a big step, although clearly it's not enough."
The generally agreed maximum "safe" temperature rise is 2C - although some vulnerable nations say this is not safe for them.
Professor Jacquie McGlade, chief scientist of the UN environment programme (UNEP) told BBC News: "I am very surprised in a positive way - the normal procedure for these events has been governments brought kicking and struggling to the table.
"Now I see member states, citizens are willingly pledging for transformational change in society. It's a participatory progress so you do feel it will stick when we leave Paris (the climate conference next month)," she said.
"When countries saw the big players - the EU, the USA - put their figures on the table, there's a bit of copycat - which is a good thing.
"Some countries sent in their commitments and having seen other countries, they took them away and came back with more ambition. That tells you this is going to be a race to the top, not the bottom." Gabon was one example, she said.
Prof McGlade, based in Nairobi, said Africa was suffering the consequences of climate change already and was determined to tackle the problem itself.
"There is a sense that this is a universal problem - the 'them and us' is beginning to disappear," she told BBC News.
"Africa is becoming more and more conscious that it has to be a leader (on energy) if it wants to attract investment. You see Africa approaching this with an appetite, then you see a country like the UK not being pro-active in a way we would have recognised before."
Charles Sena Ayenu, a Ghanaian solar entrepreneur taking part in the Rabat meeting, said: "There's still work to be done, but I see a lot of optimism, a lot of excitement and passion - not just from governments but from the private sector like us."
The positive comments are predicated on the expectation that nations will actually carry out their promises. They contradict the conclusions of a new report from the former UK chief energy scientist David Mackay, which asserts that the UN talks are doomed to fail because nations will do as little as possible.
Mr Cañete stressed that the current wave of commitments should be a starting point, not a finishing point. The EU wants the Paris conference to agree the need for a regular review of climate targets.
Follow Roger on Twitter.

Monday, 12 October 2015

the climate summit in Paris is too focussed on self interest

Paris climate summit: UN negotiations 'need redesign'

  • 8 hours ago
  •  
  • From the sectionScience & Environment
ParisImage copyrightThinkstock
Image captionScientists say the climate summit in Paris is too focussed on self interest
The UN climate negotiations are heading for failure and need a major redesign if they are to succeed, scientists say.
The pledges that individual countries are offering ahead of the Paris climate summit in December are too entrenched in self interest instead of being focussed on a common goal.
The researchers say the science of cooperation is being ignored.
Instead, they say the negotiations should focus on a common commitment on the global price of carbon.
This means countries would agree on a uniform charge for carbon pollution, a scheme that would encourage polluters to reduce their emissions.
The comments from researchers at the University of Cambridge, UK, University of Maryland, US, and University of Cologne, in Germany, are published in the journal Nature.
'I will, if you will'
Ahead of December's United Nations climate meeting, individual countries have submitted their plans for cutting greenhouse gas emissions. These are calledIntended Nationally Determined Contributions - or INDCs.
However, the researchers say that this approach will not work.
Prof David MacKay, from the University of Cambridge, who was former chief scientific advisor to Britain's Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), said: "The science of cooperation predicts that if all you are doing is naming individual contributions - offers that aren't coupled to each other - then you'll end up with a relatively poor outcome.
"We have the history of the Kyoto agreement as an example of this. Initially, the approach was to find a common commitment, but eventually it descended into a patchwork of individual commitments... and that led to very weak commitments and several countries leaving the process."
The Paris negotiations, he warned, were heading in the same direction.
Instead, the researchers say, a reciprocal approach could transform the meeting.
"If you make a treaty that is based on reciprocity, so 'I will, if you will' and 'I won't, if you won't', then you can end up in a very different position," explained Prof MacKay.
"If people make a common commitment that they will match what others do, then it becomes in your self interest to advocate a high level of action because it will apply not only to you but also to others."
Traffic jamImage copyrightThinkstock
Image captionThe scientists say setting an agreed global charge for carbon emissions
The scientists believe that setting a common price for carbon, which could be implemented through carbon tax or emissions trading schemes, could work.
Prof MacKay said: "This is a price that could be negotiated and agreed, and would apply to all countries."
The researchers admit that with the Paris climate conference just weeks away and the fact that global carbon pricing is not already on the table, their idea is unlikely to have much influence.
However, they say the science of cooperation should be taken into account for future negotiations.
Commenting on the paper, Bob Ward from the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, said: "This is a thoughtful contribution but rather too pessimistic about the United Nations climate change negotiations.
"The authors are right that a global price on carbon is necessary, although it would be, on its own, insufficient to generate the pace and scale of action required."

Monday, 11 November 2013

Mood of 'realism' about future deal at climate talks

Mood of 'realism' about future deal at climate talks

UN meetingThere were tense discussions over consensus with the Russian delegation at the end of last year's meeting in Doha

Related Stories

Negotiators from around 190 countries are meeting in Warsaw to try to advance steps towards a global climate agreement.
Participants say there is a growing sense of realism about the scale of what can be achieved in any new deal.
But there are concerns that the process could become bogged down in procedural wrangling after Russia asked for a review of voting procedures.
The meeting comes amid new warnings about global levels of warming gases.
This will be the 19th annual Conference of the Parties (COP) to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

“Start Quote

It's a recognition that where the rubber really meets the road is at the domestic level, and the agreement needs to reflect that”
Elliot DiringerCentre for Climate and Energy Solutions
At the meeting in South Africa in 2011, delegates adopted what's termed the Durban Platform which stated that a new international agreement should be negotiated by 2015 and come into force by 2020.
Pragmatic approach
Now in Poland, negotiators are coming to terms with the emerging shape of that deal.
"There is a fair degree of convergence emerging about the character of a new agreement," said Elliot Diringer from the Centre for Energy and Climate Solutions, a long-time observer of the negotiations.
"This reflects a greater sense of realism among the parties about what can accomplished in this process."
climate protestorsClimate campaigners believe the recent IPCC report settles the science over global warming
The delegates have been scarred by the experience in Copenhagen in 2009, when ambitions for a comprehensive deal foundered, despite the intense efforts of President Obama, Prime Minister Gordon Brown and others.
What's emerging now is a looser agreement whereby countries set their own targets, but are subject to some form of review by other nations.
"The sort of model that's emerging for Paris, this acceptance of the notion that commitments will be self defined, it's a recognition that where the rubber really meets the road is at the domestic level, and the agreement needs to reflect that," said Elliot Diringer.
The meeting comes after a series of studies indicating the scale of the climate challenge. The fifth assessment report from the IPCCpublished in September suggested that without concerted political action the accepted 2C threshold to dangerous climate change would be passed sometime in the middle of this century.
Just this week the World Meteorological Organization reported that concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere were higher than ever. While the UN Environment Programme detailed the yawning gap between what nations have pledged to do and where the world needs to be in 2020 to avoid the worst impacts.
According to the UNFCCC executive secretary Christiana Figueres, Warsaw is a pivotal moment to advance momentum towards a deal.
"We still have time and the means to limit warming to 2 degrees C. And the international process must push forward now to build the foundation for an ambitious universal climate agreement in 2015," she said.

Stumbling blocks

There are several issues that delegates have been divided on that could stall or derail momentum. Here are three of the most important.
Loss and damage - A key issue for developing countries which are looking for some form of compensatory mechanism for future damages caused by climate change. Developed countries are willing to provide assistance but are reluctant to set up a legal framework. A decision is due in Warsaw.
Money - Finance is always a rumbling source of discontent and in Warsaw countries must clarify how they will meet the goal of providing $100bn in climate finance annually by 2020.
MRV - It stands for the measuring, reporting and verification of pledges to cut emissions. Delegates in Warsaw will have to make a decision on how developing countries will verify their undertakings.
But there are a number of difficulties on the road to Paris where the 2015 meeting will be held.
Russia has emerged as a potential problem for the process as they have tabled an amendment on decision-making at the COP.
The process works on the basis of consensus but the Russians believe their objections were overruled at the meeting in Doha last year.
"Decision-making in the UNFCCC process has suffered evident setbacks over the past few years," the Russian delegation wrote in a statement.
It goes on to state that the voting system within the meeting needs to be addressed to rebuild confidence.
Climate cliff hanger
The Russian concerns led to stalemate at a sub-meeting in June. There are worries that this might continue to hamper progress in Warsaw, where delegates will be keener than ever to avoid a breakdown.
"This has been haunting the process even before the Russians brought it up," said Norine Kennedy, who will be representing US business at the meeting.
"We've had a succession of COP cliff hangers and one or two countries always get rolled over in the effort to find consensus and last year that was Russia.
"The consensus question will have to be faced sooner or later and it's better they do this now than in Paris," she said.
Another key question is the shifting nature of development. Where once the UNFCCC was neatly divided into developing and developed nations, with the richer ones making all the cuts in emissions, there is now a greater push for every country to bear some of the load.
But not everyone is keen on this.
"I saw some comments from the Chinese side, saying they are going to insist on a common but differentiated responsibilities point, said Norine Kennedy.
"That will be a hard fought fight and it will lurk behind most of the interventions we will hear over the next couple of weeks."
Follow Matt on Twitter.

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Tuesday, 29 January 2013

Lord Stern, author of the government-commissioned review on climate change


Nicholas Stern
Lord Stern now believes he should have been more ‘blunt’ about threat to economies from temperature rises. Photograph: Sarah Lee for the Guardian
Lord Stern, author of the government-commissioned review on climate change that became the reference work for politicians and green campaigners, now says he underestimated the risks, and should have been more "blunt" about the threat posed to the economy by rising temperatures.
In an interview at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Stern, who is now a crossbench peer, said: "Looking back, I underestimated the risks. The planet and the atmosphere seem to be absorbing less carbon than we expected, and emissions are rising pretty strongly. Some of the effects are coming through more quickly than we thought then."
The Stern review, published in 2006, pointed to a 75% chance that global temperatures would rise by between two and three degrees above the long-term average; he now believes we are "on track for something like four ". Had he known the way the situation would evolve, he says, "I think I would have been a bit more blunt. I would have been much more strong about the risks of a four- or five-degree rise."
He said some countries, including China, had now started to grasp the seriousness of the risks, but governments should now act forcefully to shift their economies towards less energy-intensive, more environmentally sustainable technologies.
"This is potentially so dangerous that we have to act strongly. Do we want to play Russian roulette with two bullets or one? These risks for many people are existential."
Stern said he backed the UK's Climate Change Act, which commits the government to ambitious carbon reduction targets. But he called for increased investment in greening the economy, saying: "It's a very exciting growth story."
David Cameron made much of his environmental credentials before the 2010 election, travelling to the Arctic to highlight his commitment to tackling global warming. But the coalition's commitment to green policies has recently been questioned, amid scepticism among Tory backbenchers about the benefits of wind power, and the chancellor's enthusiasm for exploiting Britain's shale gas reserves.
Stern's comments came as Jim Yong Kim, the new president of the World Bank, also at Davos, gave a grave warning about the risk of conflicts over natural resources should the forecast of a four-degree global increase above the historical average prove accurate.
"There will be water and food fights everywhere," Kim said as he pledged to make tackling climate change a priority of his five-year term.
Kim said action was needed to create a carbon market, eliminate fossil-fuel subsidies and "green" the world's 100 megacities, which are responsible for 60 to 70% of global emissions.
He added that the 2012 droughts in the US, which pushed up the price of wheat and maize, had led to the world's poor eating less. For the first time, the bank president said, extreme weather had been attributed to man-made climate change. "People are starting to connect the dots. If they start to forget, I am there to remind them.
"We have to find climate-friendly ways of encouraging economic growth. The good news is we think they exist".
Kim said there would be no solution to climate change without private sector involvement and urged companies to seize the opportunity to make profits: "There is a lot of money to be made in building the technologies and bending the arc of climate change."